On Feb 25, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I don't take offense at technical discussions on mailing lists. A lot can get misinterpreted. Instead, I suggest you take a look at the code and see if you think it is a horrible idea. What I'm currently actually using, but would replace with this, does have more knowledge of Logback, specifically so it can pass the objects to the Appender. Unfortunately (at least I think so), SLF4J's LocationAwareLogger doesn't provide a method to pass that information along.
I was meaning to ask. Why do you need support from LocationAwareLogger for argument arrays if you are going to use logback-classic underneath SLF4J?
I'm not sure what you are getting at here. The implementation I wrote for myself used Logback's filterAndLog method if the implementation being used was logback and Log4j's log method when it was the implementation, both of which support passing objects. However, I wouldn't want to directly tie SLF4J to any implementation. Am I misunderstanding something? Ralph