6 Aug
2009
6 Aug
'09
3:52 p.m.
On 06.08.2009, at 15:15, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
I think this would be sufficient for most cases but something like a CONFIDENTIAL marker does also make a lot of sense. This would simply be configured "around" the appender, right?
Around the appender? I am not sure what you mean, but among the various data you pass to the appender, you could pass the name of the marker (a String) that triggers confidential treatment.
What I meant were filters. Sorry about using a rather confusing description. I've never used filters before but it seems like a MarkerFilter would be the "right" way to prevent the tweeting of confidential event messages. Joern.