Dammit! A typo - it SHOULD NOT BE deprecated.<div><br></div><div>Ceki, please re-post it also.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks a good night to Switzerland!</div><div>Libor<br><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Libor Jelinek <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:ljelinek@virtage.com" target="_blank">ljelinek@virtage.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello guys,<div>I asked at equinox-dev and it seems there&#39;s no Bundle-BuddyPolicy header in OSGi standard <br>(my question listed in [1] and).</div>

<div><br></div><div>Moreover there&#39;s nothing wrong with Eclipse-BuddyPolicy (except it&#39;s Eclipse-specific). It should be deprecated - at least as far as I know.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Whether it&#39;s good idea to include this Equinox specific header is different question. My personal state is to include it because</div><div>* other OSGi frameworks will ignore this header</div><div>


* for Equinox OSGi it doesn&#39;t mean any significant load</div><div>* users wishing to go &quot;buddy classloading policy&quot; way will not have to edit manually unpack JAR, modify MANIFEST.MF headers and pack it as JAR again.</div>


<div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/equinox-dev/msg07228.html" target="_blank">http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/equinox-dev/msg07228.html</a></div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Have a nice day!</div>

<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div>Libor Jelinek</div><div><a href="http://devblog.virtage.com/libor-jelinek/" target="_blank">http://devblog.virtage.com/libor-jelinek/</a></div></font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:10 PM, ceki <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:ceki@qos.ch" target="_blank">ceki@qos.ch</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Gunnar, Ekke,<br>
<br>
FYI, since a few days, we started publishing a composite p2 repository<br>
at <a href="http://logback.qos.ch/p2/" target="_blank">http://logback.qos.ch/p2/</a>. It contains two child repositories,<br>
called &quot;proper&quot; and &quot;beagle&quot;. The &quot;beagle&quot; repo publishes the<br>
logback-beagle plugin which is a console-like view for logging. The<br>
&quot;proper&quot; repository publishes bundles for slf4j-api, logback-core and<br>
logback-classic.<br>
<br>
OSGi bundles still need a way to pass logback-classic a configuration<br>
file. Several technical for achieving this are explained by Libor<br>
Jelinek at [1]. I think logback-classic should support Eclipse buddy<br>
policy. Would you have any objections if I added<br>
&quot;Eclipse-BuddyPolicy: registered&quot; to logback-classic.jar&#39;s MANIFEST ?<br>
<br>
Your comments are most welcome,<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="http://devblog.virtage.com/2012/07/logback-and-eclipse-attaching-logback-xml/" target="_blank">http://devblog.virtage.com/<u></u>2012/07/logback-and-eclipse-<u></u>attaching-logback-xml/</a> <br><span><font color="#888888">
<br>
-- <br>
Ceki<br>
<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/ceki" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/#!/ceki</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>