25 Feb
2009
25 Feb
'09
3:09 p.m.
Joern Huxhorn wrote:
I disagree. I just implemented an enhanced version of the log4j NDC myself as you suggested on the SLF4J mailinglist. It's implemented quite similar to the logback MDC but isn't serialized/used by any standard appender. My multiplex-appenders, on the other hand, *are* evaluating it, thus adding an additional data point to the LoggingEvent. Wouldn't a similar extension be possible in Ralphs case?
How can multiplex-appenders access a field which does not exist in c.q.l.classic.spi.LoggingEvent? -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch