logback async appender
We recently switched several applications from log4j to logback and were wondering about the lack of async appender in logback. Is it not needed? I thought it was a good thing for performance and reliability reasons. I see there is an old enhancement request for it in logback bugzilla, http://bugzilla.qos.ch/show_bug.cgi?id=55 It seems that someone attempted this earlier this year (but maybe hasn't checked in yet?) http://old.nabble.com/how-to-get-appender-ref-list-via-Joran-to22295581.html... If needed and desired, we could work on a patch for this feature. In general, should it work similar to the log4j one? Or is someone else already working on it? thanks, -Gordon
I actually have written one but haven't fully tested or committed it to my fork of Logback. I'll get it committed over the weekend. Ralph On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Gordon Sims wrote:
We recently switched several applications from log4j to logback and were wondering about the lack of async appender in logback. Is it not needed? I thought it was a good thing for performance and reliability reasons.
I see there is an old enhancement request for it in logback bugzilla,
http://bugzilla.qos.ch/show_bug.cgi?id=55
It seems that someone attempted this earlier this year (but maybe hasn't checked in yet?)
http://old.nabble.com/how-to-get-appender-ref-list-via-Joran-to22295581.html...
If needed and desired, we could work on a patch for this feature. In general, should it work similar to the log4j one? Or is someone else already working on it?
thanks, -Gordon
_______________________________________________ logback-dev mailing list logback-dev@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev
I attached it to LBCLASSIC-176. Ralph On Dec 18, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I actually have written one but haven't fully tested or committed it to my fork of Logback. I'll get it committed over the weekend.
Ralph
On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Gordon Sims wrote:
We recently switched several applications from log4j to logback and were wondering about the lack of async appender in logback. Is it not needed? I thought it was a good thing for performance and reliability reasons.
I see there is an old enhancement request for it in logback bugzilla,
http://bugzilla.qos.ch/show_bug.cgi?id=55
It seems that someone attempted this earlier this year (but maybe hasn't checked in yet?)
http://old.nabble.com/how-to-get-appender-ref-list-via-Joran-to22295581.html...
If needed and desired, we could work on a patch for this feature. In general, should it work similar to the log4j one? Or is someone else already working on it?
thanks, -Gordon
_______________________________________________ logback-dev mailing list logback-dev@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev
I attached my take on a log4j-like AsyncAppender for logback to http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-177 LBCLASSIC-177 . Torsten -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/logback-async-appender-tp26848005p26994869.html Sent from the Logback Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (3)
-
Gordon Sims -
Ralph Goers -
Torsten Juergeleit