[JIRA] Commented: (LBCLASSIC-36) Synchronization of SimpleDateFormat object in DateConverter

[ http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system... ] Ralph Goers commented on LBCLASSIC-36: -------------------------------------- My results on my Macbook Pro. The difference is a little bit more significant, possibly since it is obviously a much faster machine. If this holds true then in production this would be even more significant. Unfortunately, I don't have a quad or 8-way processor to test this. === DateFormatting === java.runtime.version = 1.5.0_16-b06-284 java.vendor = Apple Inc. java.version = 1.5.0_16 os.name = Mac OS X os.version = 10.5.7 JODA: total of 13410524 operations, or 4470 operations per millisecond SDF: total of 10319665 operations, or 3439 operations per millisecond
Synchronization of SimpleDateFormat object in DateConverter -----------------------------------------------------------
Key: LBCLASSIC-36 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-36 Project: logback-classic Issue Type: Bug Components: Other Affects Versions: unspecified Environment: Operating System: All Platform: All Reporter: Anders Hammar Assignee: Ceki Gulcu Attachments: DateConverter_patch.java, DateFormatPerfTest.java, dateformattest.zip
According to the API documentation of SimpleDateFormat, date formats are not synchronized and it is recommended to create separate format instances for each thread. However, a possibly simpler (mer efficient) solution would be to synchronize on the SimpleDateFormat object in the convert() method to prevent two threads to access it concurrently.
-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
participants (1)
-
Ralph Goers (JIRA)