4 Feb
2011
4 Feb
'11
1:45 p.m.
I much prefer things to fail fast and ugly rather than gracefully skipping over and leaving me scratching my head as to why it's working but not the way I expected. ----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael C Rosenstein" <mcr@mdibl.org> To: logback-user@qos.ch Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 1:33:56 PM Subject: Re: [logback-user] Using conditional processing
In the absence of Janino on the classpath, logback should now gracefully skip over the conditional part.
I wonder if it should be less graceful and produce an error/warning to indicate that the conditional is going to be ignored? _______________________________________________ Logback-user mailing list Logback-user@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user