On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ceki Gulcu <ceki@qos.ch> wrote:

> If you have a hard dependency on log4j that you can't change then I
> guess you have to use log4j.

I agree but may be the caller could be satisfied with NOP.

It should be possible to satisfy most callers except perhaps in
certain cases which could become rather hard to diagnose due to the
NOP trickery...

In that case it might be nice to let the caller implement the log4j functionality or at least allow it to be optionally included so the caller *can* implement it.

For what it is worth it I haven't ever had this problem.

--Nik