
7 Mar
2013
7 Mar
'13
6:44 p.m.
Interesting, my threads are very short lived (basically handling a single operation), so I am not that concerned about memory usage. In fact, in fact, my grouped entries do not even have to be chronological. If entries from thread B appear earlier than those from A in my example, that's OK as long as all B's are written before all As. Since I am very new to lockback I am not sure about the best way to proceed, but some stateful Encoder is what I am currently thinking. -- View this message in context: http://logback.10977.n7.nabble.com/Is-grouped-deferred-log-statements-from-s... Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.