Bump. I'm looking into using logback for audit logging. As I will not be using different levels, logback's design fits beautifully. However, not being on a 1.0 level is a problem. It would be great with a rough time plan for the 1.0 release! /Anders Pascale, Peter H. wrote:
We're interested in logback as a replacement to log4j. One of the questions I get is what's the span in time and features between logback today (v0.9.8) and a v1.0 release. Yes, yes - that magical 1.0 carries a lot of weight with folks...
In trolling the archives and documentation - I did see reference to the fact that the team believes in the value of sound documentation, and the team isn't comfortable with a v1.0 release without good documentation. Seems you are on track to rectify that, and I think the manual is great. Bug fixes - I'm having a hard time determining the remaining significant open defects. Would you characterize the 0.9.8 - 1 span as having a lot of fixes? Few but important fixes? And what about features.
And I hate to dredge up this topic - but will we ever see a config file watch such as log4j, and that was requested recently. Not a deal breaker for us - given the arguments for JMX config reload.
And the magical question - rough timing of v1.0? Before 2008?
Thanks!
Peter Pascale
Pearson VUE
**************************************************************************** This email may contain material confidential to Pearson. If you were not an intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies. We may monitor email to and from our network. ****************************************************************************
_______________________________________________ Logback-user mailing list Logback-user@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Logback-v1.0--tp13389985p14536392.html Sent from the Logback User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.