Ceki Gulcu schrieb:
While the general archirecture is very similar, there are many differences. See
http://svn.qos.ch/repos/logback/trunk/logback-site/src/site/resources/logbac...
for a short presentation on logback. (The presentation used to be called "Ten reasons to switch to logback". thx IMHO, the higher activity seen in logback compared to log4j may be your most important reason to switch.
the main reason why I was asking about the real differences: I made my decision to use SLF4J as API and to use LOGBack as implementation. ...runs all inside OSGI Enterprise (client/server) application based on: Eclipse Equinox, Eclipse Riena, Easybeans / Hibernate etc. so I'm using bundles with the bridges between slf4j and log4j, jcl, jul and also wrote my osgi-over-slf4j bundle as bridge between OSGI log services, OSGI framework events, OSGI bundle events... all works well ...but there was a question in my blog why I'm not using PAX-Logging as bridge to other legacy logging frameworks. but PAX Logging uses Log4J as implementation and I'm working on my next blog entries and wanted to provide a matrix to compare features of log4j and logback ekke