At 07:13 PM 2/7/2007, Eric Crahen wrote:

You bet, <http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38>http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38

Good, thanks.

Along similar lines, I wonder if it makes sense to move log4j-bridge up to slf4j, or the jcl-bridge down into logback? Keeping all of the facade code in one place.

Funny you should mention it. Log4j-bridge used to be in SLF4J. However, since SLF4J does not have a notion of MDC, we had to migrate log4h-bridge into logback, where logback-classic includes an MDC class equivalent to log4j's MDC. As for jcl-over-slf4j, SLF4J is its natural home. As I said, the same is also true for log4j-bridge. Unfortunately, we couldn't get log4j-bridge to work as expected under the SLF4J roof. Cheers, -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch