I absolutely agree that LGPL or GPL+classpath are valid and reasonablelicenses... it just makes it a little less business friendly. Does the GPL+classpath allow for writing extensions and plugins for logback that I can license as a non-copyleft license (apache /BSD/X11 or closed source)? ----- Original Message ---- From: Ceki Gulcu <listid@qos.ch> To: logback users list <logback-user@qos.ch> Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 12:42:41 PM Subject: Re: [logback-user] GPL+Classpath exception Logback is related to log4j, but it is not an Apache project. The difference in license is one way to get the point across. Moreover, LGPL or GPL+classpath exception are both valid and reasonable licenses for libraries such as logback. Arthur Blake wrote:

I'm just curious... why did you decide not to use the Apache license for logback... ? -- Ceki Gülcü QOS.ch is looking to hire talented developers in Switzerland. If interested, please contact c e k i @ q o s . c h

_______________________________________________ Logback-user mailing list Logback-user@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com