Re: [slf4j-dev] Proposal for SLF4J 2.0 Logger API

On 19.12.2019 21:35, Remko Popma wrote:

For the SLF4J API to be genuinely generic enough to span the requirements and abilities of many possible logging backends, it should not be too opinionated.

Have you had a chance to look at Yang et al’s work on NanoLog ( https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc18/atc18-yang.pdf, https://github.com/PlatformLab/NanoLog)?

Thank you for the link. I am reading right now.