Thanks for the tip. Created.

James A. N. Stauffer        http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Robert Elliot <rob@lidalia.org.uk> wrote:

I'm not a committer, so this isn't a rebuke or anything, just a friendly suggestion. You might get more comments & chance of a merge via a pull request on GitHub - easier for everyone. 

Rob

On 21 May 2013, at 19:57, "James A. N. Stauffer" <stauffer.james@gmail.com> wrote:

Attached fixes/improvements.

James A. N. Stauffer        http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, James A. N. Stauffer <stauffer.james@gmail.com> wrote:

I have attached two patches that add support for parameterized logging. Comments?

James A. N. Stauffer        http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:17 AM, James A. N. Stauffer <stauffer.james@gmail.com> wrote:

(I didn't notice any FAQ/guidelines, etc so please direct me to them if the exist so I can follow protocol.)

My employer has many projects that use log4j and slf4j is now the approved logging framework. I would like the conversion to make use of the format messages with parameterized logging and remove the calls to is*Enabled().

It appears that slf4j-migrator doesn't support that so is there any comment, direction, etc on me adding support for that?

James A. N. Stauffer        http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/

<0003-Fixed-minor-bugs-with-format-conversion.patch>

_______________________________________________
slf4j-dev mailing list
slf4j-dev@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev

_______________________________________________
slf4j-dev mailing list
slf4j-dev@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev