
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java". The branch, master has been updated via d9e7175fb77832e2366a5755995bb14399f015fa (commit) via d380a0953e126827e9efbbb501a7352b17bb21f2 (commit) from ebf05781718598adebd1e8fc058f459891002682 (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=d9e7175fb77832e2366a5755995... http://github.com/ceki/slf4j/commit/d9e7175fb77832e2366a5755995bb14399f015fa commit d9e7175fb77832e2366a5755995bb14399f015fa Merge: d380a09 ebf0578 Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki@qos.ch> Date: Thu Jun 16 11:22:26 2011 +0200 Merge branch 'master' of git.qos.ch:slf4j http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=d380a0953e126827e9efbbb501a... http://github.com/ceki/slf4j/commit/d380a0953e126827e9efbbb501a7352b17bb21f2 commit d380a0953e126827e9efbbb501a7352b17bb21f2 Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki@qos.ch> Date: Thu Jun 16 11:22:09 2011 +0200 precision regarding logback diff --git a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/faq.html b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/faq.html index 155f4df..ecd5d48 100644 --- a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/faq.html +++ b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/faq.html @@ -194,12 +194,13 @@ <dd> <p>In short, libraries and other embedded components should - consider SLF4J for their logging needs because libraries - cannot afford to impose their choice of logging system on the - end-user. On the other hand, it does not necessarily make - sense for stand-alone applications to use SLF4J. Stand-alone - applications can invoke the logging system of their choice - directly. + consider SLF4J for their logging needs because libraries cannot + afford to impose their choice of logging framework on the + end-user. On the other hand, it does not necessarily make sense + for stand-alone applications to use SLF4J. Stand-alone + applications can invoke the logging framework of their choice + directly. In the case of logback, the question is moot because + logback exposes its logger API via SLF4J. </p> <p>SLF4J is only a facade, meaning that it does not provide a ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: slf4j-site/src/site/pages/faq.html | 13 +++++++------ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) hooks/post-receive -- SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java