SLF4J / SLF4J-371 [Resolved] Support the lambda expression in the Logger ============================== Here's what changed in this issue in the last few minutes. There is 1 comment. View or comment on issue using this link https://jira.qos.ch/browse/SLF4J-371 ============================== 1 comment ------------------------------ Alexander Kiselyov on 28/Dec/21 1:53 AM ??but I am not sure why you are missing/ignoring my point??? I'm equally not sure why are you keep talking to a strawman. The comment I made is quite clear about the fact that I'm not against adding varargs versions to the existing APIs: 'since there's no varargs version of [addArgument|https://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/spi/LoggingEventBuilder.html#addArgument...)] or {{addKeyValue}}, *which may actually be useful to have*.', so not against overloading {{log()}} with {{varargs-supporting-Supplier}} version either. But I - just as you are - neither a library owner nor a maintainer/their advisor and, hence, have no influence over making the final decision, so your allegations regarding any deflection, promotion and such are absolutely unfounded and ridiculous. ??pointing at stupid and insignificant errors in my examples?? I never made any comments about the quality of your examples, made any jokes on them or your knowledge of Java, etc., so the only place where you can find any hostility or trolling is your comments, which your last reply to @[~toolforger] illustrates quite clearly. The one and only point of explaining in details why they are not functional was to help you and anyone else who has a similar problem and bumps into this thread to better understand the library API and the programming language they try to use. What I saw in return was false accusations and insults (not only towards me, but other people too), so I don't feel I should answer any of your comments in future. Good luck with whatever you're trying to achieve. ============================== This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.8.0#808000-sha1:e2c7e59)