http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138 Dimo Velev <dimo.velev@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimo.velev@gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Dimo Velev <dimo.velev@gmail.com> 2010-02-23 16:26:49 --- Hi, I also find it better to use a Set in this case instead of a List. The reason for this is that a Set better communicates the actual usage of the implementations-collection in this piece of code (LoggerFactory). When you see a List you automatically think of a collection which allows duplicates. Well, in this case I think that the implementation actually means that this is a collection which does not care for duplicates and this is expressed by a Set. Just my own opinion as someone reading the source code. Best regards, Dimo -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.