SLF4J / SLF4J-495 [Open] Binary compatibility between release and alpha version ============================== Here's what changed in this issue in the last few minutes. There is 1 comment. View or comment on issue using this link https://jira.qos.ch/browse/SLF4J-495 ============================== 1 comment ------------------------------ Rufus Andrews on 10/Jul/21 6:13 AM Thanks for bringing this up - I was wondering the same thing and thought I'd misunderstood something. The bold sentences in the FAQ are indeed misleading on this matter and should be corrected IMO. It's a shame that library developers can't unilaterally decide to use the new fluent API without forcing consumers of their library to also upgrade slf4j-api and their chosen logging framework to 2.0, although I do understand why this must be the case. I suspect that this will impair real-world adoption of the 2.0 API in spite of its advantages. ============================== This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.8.0#808000-sha1:e2c7e59)