http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31 --- Comment #82 from Ralph Goers <rgoers@apache.org> 2010-04-01 02:17:20 --- I have no idea what the compiler is doing. I had a method isEnabled(Level level, Marker marker, String msg, Object... args); I was calling it as isEnabled(level, marker, msg, null); I was stunned at how much worse this was than SLF4J/Logback. I changed it to isEnabled(Level level, Marker marker, String msg); and call it as isEnabled(level, marker, msg) and the performance is about the same as SLF4J/Logback. After that I made methods with 1, 2, and 3 params and then one that finally accepts varargs, very similar to how SLF4J does it. Interestingly, just before working on this code I attended a talk by Joshua Block were he discussed something very similar. http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/fall2009/cmsc132H/slides/still-effective.pdf - See slide 27. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.