January 2011 - logback-dev - mailman3.qos.ch

[JIRA] Created: (LBCORE-146) SiftingAppender TimeBasedRollingPolicy MaxHistory not deleting old files
by Hrotkó Gábor (JIRA) 03 Feb '12

03 Feb '12

SiftingAppender TimeBasedRollingPolicy MaxHistory not deleting old files ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: LBCORE-146 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCORE-146 Project: logback-core Issue Type: Bug Components: Rolling Affects Versions: 0.9.18 Environment: linux64, jdk1.6.0_17-b04, apache-tomcat-6.0.24 Reporter: Hrotkó Gábor Assignee: Logback dev list When I use SiftingAppender with TimeBasedRollingPolicy, old files does not get deleted when the MaxHistory is set. logback.xml snipet: <configuration debug="true" scan="true" scanPeriod="5 seconds"> <appender name="SIFT" class="ch.qos.logback.classic.sift.SiftingAppender"> <discriminator> <Key>userid</Key> <DefaultValue>base</DefaultValue> </discriminator> <sift> <appender name="FILE-${userid}" class="ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.RollingFileAppender"> <File>/usr/local/tomcat6/logs/myLog_${userid}.log</File> <Append>false</Append> <layout class="ch.qos.logback.classic.PatternLayout"> <Pattern>%d [%thread] %level %mdc %logger.%method:%line - %msg%n</Pattern> </layout> <RollingPolicy class="ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingPolicy"> <FileNamePattern>/usr/local/tomcat6/logs/myLog_${userid}.%d{yyyy-MM-dd}.log</FileNamePattern>  <MaxHistory>2</MaxHistory> </RollingPolicy> </appender> </sift> </appender> ... With the config above, the files gets sifted and rolled well, but old files not deleted. When I change the filenames, and delete the ${userid} sifting, it works well. ... <File>/usr/local/tomcat6/logs/myLog.log</File> ... <FileNamePattern>/usr/local/tomcat6/logs/myLog.%d{yyyy-MM-dd}.log</FileNamePattern> ... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

1 1

[JIRA] Created: (LBCLASSIC-171) Exception data sometimes does not get logged when using warn(String, Throwable)
by Marshall Pierce (JIRA) 25 Oct '11

25 Oct '11

Exception data sometimes does not get logged when using warn(String, Throwable) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: LBCLASSIC-171 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-171 Project: logback-classic Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.917 Environment: Linux, sun jdk 1.6.0_07 Reporter: Marshall Pierce Assignee: Logback dev list Source: try { doStuff(); } catch (PhaseException e) { this.logger.warn("Phase failed:", e); this.logger.debug("Another log message"); ... Log contents: phase.StandardPhase - Phase failed: phase.StandardPhase - Another log message The strange thing is that this doesn't happen all the time or even most of the time. Almost always, the exception data does get logged. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

2 3

[JIRA] Created: (LBCLASSIC-131) Missing Import-Package declaration in logback-classic causes problem with RollingFileAppender
by Pavol Juhos (JIRA) 25 Oct '11

25 Oct '11

Missing Import-Package declaration in logback-classic causes problem with RollingFileAppender --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: LBCLASSIC-131 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-131 Project: logback-classic Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.9.15 Environment: OSGi Service Platform Release 4 Reporter: Pavol Juhos Assignee: Logback dev list In OSGi environment logback-core will correctly try to use the class-loader of logback-classic bundle to load classes of the selected Appenders. This however means that logback-classic needs to have visibility to the requested Appender classes. Since RollingFileAppender is located in a separate package "ch.qos.logback.core.rolling" and not explicitly referenced from logback-classic code, the respective Import-Package declaration will not be generated automatically by the BND tool (embedded in maven-bundle-plugin). In order to avoid ClassNotFound exceptions when trying to use RollingFileAppender the appropriate Import-Package declarations have to be added explicitly to the configuration of maven-bundle-plugin in logback-classic POM. The current <Import-Package> settings in maven-bundle-plugin configuration: <Import-Package>sun.reflect;resolution:=optional, javax.jms;resolution:=optional, * </Import-Package> Suggested update: <Import-Package>sun.reflect;resolution:=optional, javax.jms;resolution:=optional, ch.qos.logback.core.rolling, ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.helper, * </Import-Package> Please consider also to implement the related issue LBCLASSIC-121 when fixing this defect. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

5 6

[JIRA] Created: (LBCORE-147) RollingPolicy MaxHistory not deleting old files
by Rafael Diaz Maurin (JIRA) 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

RollingPolicy MaxHistory not deleting old files ----------------------------------------------- Key: LBCORE-147 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCORE-147 Project: logback-core Issue Type: Bug Components: Rolling Affects Versions: 0.9.18 Environment: linux 2.6.18 64bits apache-tomcat-6.0.20 java/jre1.6.0_18 Reporter: Rafael Diaz Maurin Assignee: Logback dev list The MaxHistory does not do the trick : the old files are not deleted at all : cat logging.xml <appender name="IDP_ACCESS" class="ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.RollingFileAppender"> <File>/shibboleth-idp/logs/idp-access.log</File> <Append>false</Append> <ImmediateFlush>true</ImmediateFlush> <RollingPolicy class="ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingPolicy"> <FileNamePattern>/shibboleth-idp/logs/old/idp-access-%d{yyyy-MM-dd_HH-mm}.log.gz</FileNamePattern> <MaxHistory>3</MaxHistory> </RollingPolicy> <layout class="ch.qos.logback.classic.PatternLayout"> <Pattern>%msg%n</Pattern> </layout> </appender> -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 35

[JIRA] Created: (LBACCESS-17) LogbackValve overrides final start() method from LifecycleBase in Tomcat 7
by Grzegorz Grzybek (JIRA) 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

LogbackValve overrides final start() method from LifecycleBase in Tomcat 7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: LBACCESS-17 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBACCESS-17 Project: logback-access Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.9.26 Reporter: Grzegorz Grzybek Assignee: Logback dev list Priority: Critical {code} java.lang.VerifyError: class ch.qos.logback.access.tomcat.LogbackValve overrides final method start.()V {code} Tomcat 7 has changed the LifecycleBase implementation - it should not override start() but rather startInternal() -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

3 3

[JIRA] Created: (LBCLASSIC-217) Exception stack trace printing starting from root cause
by Tomasz Nurkiewicz (JIRA) 24 Sep '11

24 Sep '11

Exception stack trace printing starting from root cause ------------------------------------------------------- Key: LBCLASSIC-217 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-217 Project: logback-classic Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: 0.9.22 Reporter: Tomasz Nurkiewicz Assignee: Logback dev list A typical exception in multi-tier application looks similar to this: com.acme.BusinessException: Can't process request at ... at ... Caused by: com.acme.dao.PersistenceException: Can't access database at ... at ... ... 49 common frames omitted Caused by: org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.lookup.DataSourceLookupFailureException: Unable to locate datasource at ... at ... ... 65 common frames omitted Caused by: java.net.UnknownHostException: Unknown host localhostt at ... at ... ... 84 common frames omitted The deeper exception, the more specific information it gives. Typically the last "Caused by" is the most interesting one. So it seems like reversing the order in which the exceptions are thrown (from most specific to consecutive, less specific wrappers) might be more intuitive: java.net.UnknownHostException: Unknown host localhostt at ... at ... Wrapped by: org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.lookup.DataSourceLookupFailureException: Unable to connect to the database at ... at ... Wrapped by: com.acme.dao.PersistenceException: Can't access database at ... at ... Wrapped by: com.acme.BusinessException: Can't process request at ... at ... It is not only easier to read and follow (business exception is interesting for the end user while the most precise, technical information is for developers and system administrators - so it should be easily accessible in the logs), but also the stack trace isn't mixed. You can read stack frames in exactly the same order as they were executed, no need to jump from one stack trace line to another (see attachment from the real application). This also means that the beginning of the thread is always at the bottom and the line that caused the very first exception - at the top. (look at the attached real exception) I already implemented this feature by adding RootCauseFirstThrowableProxyConverter extending ch.qos.logback.classic.pattern.ExtendedThrowableProxyConverter. It is turned on by appending "%rEx" to the encoder pattern. If you like this feature, I will push the changes (just few classes have changed) into my GitHub fork. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

2 8

[JIRA] Created: (LBCORE-79) FixedWindowRollingPolicy performs compression on the logging thread
by Szel Zoltan (JIRA) 02 Sep '11

02 Sep '11

FixedWindowRollingPolicy performs compression on the logging thread ------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: LBCORE-79 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCORE-79 Project: logback-core Issue Type: Improvement Components: Rolling Affects Versions: 0.9.13 Reporter: Szel Zoltan Assignee: Logback dev list Hi, the FixedWindowRollingPolicy performs the compression on the logging thread which can bring the application to halt, when compressing large files. Please consider modifing the FixedWindowRollingPolicy to perform the operation on a background thread as requested in LBCORE-48. Regards, Zoltan Szel -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

2 2

[JIRA] Created: (LBCORE-179) conversion word %ex length handling is off by one
by Michael Osipov (JIRA) 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

conversion word %ex length handling is off by one ------------------------------------------------- Key: LBCORE-179 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCORE-179 Project: logback-core Issue Type: Bug Components: Pattern Affects Versions: 0.9.26 Reporter: Michael Osipov Assignee: Logback dev list The %ex and %xEx define a stack trace length. The integer spec is somewhat faulty and misleading. First of all this is a stack trace depth imho and not length. Anyway, I was poking around with the SMTPAppender and wanted to include the sole exception message into the subject. The outcome was: 1. The docs do not define a valid interval for the integer value. You can only deduce from logic. 2. I defined %ex{short} and it included 2 lines of the stack trace. 3. I defined %ex{2} and it included 3 lines of the stack trace. 4. I defined %ex{0} and it included 1 line of the stack trace. 5. Defining any negative number omits the stack trace. But it does not make sense at all to have a negative stack trace depth. I checked also the source of the [https://github.com/ceki/logback/blob/master/logback-classic/src/main/java/c… converter], the lines 54 and 58 cause the problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

2 3

[JIRA] Created: (LBGENERAL-35) TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest failed
by Ralph Goers (JIRA) 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest failed --------------------------------------------- Key: LBGENERAL-35 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBGENERAL-35 Project: logback-general Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: 0.9.17 Environment: Mac OSX Reporter: Ralph Goers Assignee: Logback dev list This is not a frequent occurence. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test set: ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.411 sec <<< FAILURE! montlyRollover(ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest) Time elapsed: 0.114 sec montlyRolloverOverManyPeriods(ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest) Time elapsed: 0.253 sec dailyRollover(ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest) Time elapsed: 0.058 sec dailyCronologRollover(ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest) Time elapsed: 0.108 sec dailySizeBasedRollover(ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest) Time elapsed: 0.454 sec dailyChronologSizeBasedRollover(ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest) Time elapsed: 0.417 sec <<< ERROR! java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerGet(FutureTask.java:228) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:91) at ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest.doRollover(TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest.java:194) at ch.qos.logback.core.rolling.TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest.dailyChronologSizeBasedRollover(TimeBasedRollingWithArchiveRemovalTest.java:157) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:59) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTestMethod(MethodRoadie.java:98) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:79) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:87) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:77) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:42) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.invokeTestMethod(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:88) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.runMethods(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:51) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner$1.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:27) at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:37) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:42) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62) at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140) at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:127) at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:338) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:997) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

5 7

[JIRA] Created: (LBCLASSIC-116) SyslogAppender should support RFC 5424
by Ralph Goers (JIRA) 16 Aug '11

16 Aug '11

SyslogAppender should support RFC 5424 -------------------------------------- Key: LBCLASSIC-116 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-116 Project: logback-classic Issue Type: Improvement Components: appender Affects Versions: 0.9.16 Environment: All Reporter: Ralph Goers Assignee: Logback dev list The SyslogAppender supports RFC 3164. RFC 5424 has been released with obsoletes RFC 3164. See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5424.txt. At the very least the format of the timestamp has been changed. Either the SyslogAppender should be enhanced to comply with RFC 5424 or a new SyslogAppender should be created which does. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

3 19