January 2010 - slf4j-dev - mailman3.qos.ch

[Bug 166] New: please add OSGI informations to jul-to-slf4j-1.5.10.jar
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 02 Sep '11

02 Sep '11

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166 Summary: please add OSGI informations to jul-to-slf4j-1.5.10.jar Product: SLF4J Version: 1.5.x Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.3 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Unspecified AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: ekke(a)ekkes-corner.org jul-to-slf4j-1.5.10.jar MANIFEST.MF is missing OSGI Informations ... Import-Package: org.slf4j;version="1.5.10", org.slf4j.spi;version="1.5.10" Export-Package: org.slf4j.bridge;version="1.5.10" ... so you have to wrap it by yourself or as workaround use the Bundle provided by SpringSource: http://www.springsource.com/repository/app/bundle/version/detail?name=com.s… ----- thx ekke -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 163] New: Copy & paste of LoggerFactory.getLogger
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 19 Jul '11

19 Jul '11

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163 Summary: Copy & paste of LoggerFactory.getLogger Product: SLF4J Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core API AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: thomas.tom.mueller(a)gmail.com This is a feature request. Currently, when I create a new logger in a class, I copy & paste the following line from another class: private static Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(AcmeImpl.class); Sometimes I forget to change the class name. SLF4J could help me here. I suggest to add a new method, so the class name is not required, so that I can copy & paste the line without having to remember that I have to change the class name. Also, it's a bit shorter: private static Logger log = LoggerFactory.getCallerClassLogger(); This is copy & paste friendly. The implementation is tricky, but trivial once you understand it: getCallerClassLogger() { return getLogger(new Error().getStackTrace()[1].getClassName()); } There is a project that tries to solve the copy & paste problem: http://code.google.com/p/morbok/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 40

[Bug 164] New: NPE on LoggerFactory.singleImplementationSanityCheck
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 04 Apr '10

04 Apr '10

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164 Summary: NPE on LoggerFactory.singleImplementationSanityCheck Product: SLF4J Version: 1.5.x Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: Core API AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: joakim.erdfelt(a)gmail.com This occurs on slf4j-api 1.5.7 and 1.5.8 when using logback 0.9.18 It does not occur on slf4j-api 1.5.6 Note: the environment being used has various java.endorsed.dirs setup where the logging is initialized. This being not very normal, it could be the reason for this NPE, as I believe LoggerFactory.class.getClassLoader() will return null in this scenario. java.lang.NullPointerException at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.singleImplementationSanityCheck(LoggerFactory.java:192) at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.performInitialization(LoggerFactory.java:113) at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getILoggerFactory(LoggerFactory.java:269) at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(LoggerFactory.java:242) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.log.Slf4jLog.<init>(Slf4jLog.java:33) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.log.Slf4jLog.<init>(Slf4jLog.java:28) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 161] New: log4j-over-slf4j doesn't implement org.apache.log4j.spi. RootCategory
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 04 Apr '10

04 Apr '10

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161 Summary: log4j-over-slf4j doesn't implement org.apache.log4j.spi.RootCategory Product: SLF4J Version: 1.5.x Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: log4j-over-slf4j AssignedTo: dev(a)slf4j.org ReportedBy: boris(a)granveaud.com Some libraries (for example SmartGWT EE) use the classes located in package org.apache.log4j.spi. These classes should be emulated in log4j-over-slf4j. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

2 4

BasicMDCAdapter
by Gunnar Wagenknecht 06 Mar '10

06 Mar '10

Hi, I noticed that the BasicMDCAdapter uses a regular InheritableThreadLocal while the LogbackMDCAdapter uses a custom "CopyOnInheritThreadLocal". The JavaDoc implies that they should be similar. Any reasons why the difference in implementation was chosen (perhaps performance, memory)? Also BasicMDCAdapter seems to require Java 5 although it's part of the SLF4J API library. It calls ThreadLocal#remove() directly (without reflection) which does not exists in JDK <= 1.4. -Gunnar -- Gunnar Wagenknecht gunnar(a)wagenknecht.org http://wagenknecht.org/

2 1

[GIT] SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java branch, master, updated. v1.5.9.RC1-17-g6d5506b
by git-noreply＠pixie.qos.ch 21 Jan '10

21 Jan '10

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java". The branch, master has been updated via 6d5506bcda25187d0cc1ad7319e07713fa2e164e (commit) from cfb117d9e4c0fc44313328e8a8f9b74ad9bbf622 (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=6d5506bcda25187d0cc1ad7319… http://github.com/ceki/slf4j/commit/6d5506bcda25187d0cc1ad7319e07713fa2e164e commit 6d5506bcda25187d0cc1ad7319e07713fa2e164e Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki(a)qos.ch> Date: Thu Jan 21 11:55:16 2010 +0100 changes reference to log4jManual diff --git a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/templates/left.js b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/templates/left.js index e2a630a..510ea40 100644 --- a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/templates/left.js +++ b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/templates/left.js @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ document.write('</div>'); document.write('<p> </p>'); document.write('<p class="pub">'); -document.write(' <a href="https://www.qos.ch/shop/products/log4j/log4j-Manual.jsp">'); +document.write(' <a href="https://www.qos.ch/shop/products/log4jManual">'); document.write(' <img src="images/buyDirect.jpg" border="0" title="" alt="buy direct from the developer"/>'); document.write(' </a>'); document.write('</p>'); \ No newline at end of file ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: slf4j-site/src/site/pages/templates/left.js | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) hooks/post-receive -- SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java

1 0

licensing
by Espák Miklós 13 Jan '10

13 Jan '10

Hi, I am developing a framework over Prolog APIs for Java. It is a facade for Prolog implementations, just like SLF4J is for logging APIs. I used some code from SLF4J, and I have modified that for my purposes. I renamed the files (e.g. LoggerFactory to ProverFactory). I want to release the software under LGPL. The MIT license of SLF4J permits this. Which of the following is the correct way of doing this? 1. I drop the MIT licence, and use LGPL, reserving the copyright statement of the original authors, and adding my copyright, e.g. in the following way: "Copyright by <me>, under LGPL License. Credits to XY for the original code of ZYX from library SLF4J. 2. I keep the MIT licence and the copyright statement of the original authors and add my copyright because of the modifications. This way certain files would be licenced under the MIT licence, and most of the source files under LGPL. I would prefer the first version, if possible, so that I do not need to use several licences in the same project. Regards, Miklos Espak

2 2