December 2010 - slf4j-dev - mailman3.qos.ch

[Bug 209] New: Java 5 API used
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 13 Dec '10

13 Dec '10

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209 Summary: Java 5 API used Product: SLF4J Version: 1.6.x Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Core API AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: dsills(a)datasourceinc.com I noted when running a JUnit test using SLF4J 1.6.1 under Java 1.4.2 that a Java 5 API method was used, which created a problem but did not prevent logging altogether, simply printed out a stack trace. It should be no great issue to fix, I should think: Unexpected problem occured during version sanity check Reported exception: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.util.Arrays.toString([Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/String; at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.versionSanityCheck(LoggerFactory.java:161) at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.performInitialization(LoggerFactory.java:106) at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getILoggerFactory(LoggerFactory.java:235) at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(LoggerFactory.java:208) at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(LoggerFactory.java:221) at com.datasourceinc.alerts.util.AlertsFileParser.<init>(AlertsFileParser.java:15) at com.datasourceinc.alerts.util.FileParsingTest.testParse(FileParsingTest.java:19) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164) at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130) at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124) at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109) at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120) at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:230) at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:225) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestReference.run(JUnit3TestReference.java:130) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197) (BTW, I note that Windows 7 is not on your OS list and used Windows XP so as to come as close as I could.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[GIT] SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java branch, master, updated. v_1.6.1-16-g9d2796d
by git-noreply＠pixie.qos.ch 09 Dec '10

09 Dec '10

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java". The branch, master has been updated via 9d2796d04333e3790cc6f8d30d0b003a34ff942a (commit) from b6e0c251129fb0eb4da237cbb9a99517599b6f5d (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=9d2796d04333e3790cc6f8d30d… http://github.com/ceki/slf4j/commit/9d2796d04333e3790cc6f8d30d0b003a34ff942a commit 9d2796d04333e3790cc6f8d30d0b003a34ff942a Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki(a)qos.ch> Date: Thu Dec 9 11:31:24 2010 +0100 added the isInstalled method to SLF4JBridgeHandler diff --git a/jul-to-slf4j/src/main/java/org/slf4j/bridge/SLF4JBridgeHandler.java b/jul-to-slf4j/src/main/java/org/slf4j/bridge/SLF4JBridgeHandler.java index 850b989..73f6373 100644 --- a/jul-to-slf4j/src/main/java/org/slf4j/bridge/SLF4JBridgeHandler.java +++ b/jul-to-slf4j/src/main/java/org/slf4j/bridge/SLF4JBridgeHandler.java @@ -140,6 +140,24 @@ public class SLF4JBridgeHandler extends Handler { } } + /** + * Returns true if SLF4JBridgeHandler has been previously installed, returns false otherwise. + * @return + * @throws SecurityException + */ + public static boolean isInstalled() throws SecurityException { + java.util.logging.Logger rootLogger = LogManager.getLogManager().getLogger( + ""); + Handler[] handlers = rootLogger.getHandlers(); + for (int i = 0; i < handlers.length; i++) { + if (handlers[i] instanceof SLF4JBridgeHandler) { + return true; + } + } + return false; + } + + /** * Initialize this handler. * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: .../java/org/slf4j/bridge/SLF4JBridgeHandler.java | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) hooks/post-receive -- SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java

1 0

slf4j compatibility reports
by Andrey Ponomarenko 08 Dec '10

08 Dec '10

Hello, I've seen slf4j compatibility reports at [1] computed by the Clirr tool and just want to inform you about our alternative test results at [2]. Our tools are very young and may produce false positives/negatives at the moment, but the slf4j expert is needed to verify it. If you are still interested in backward compatibility then tell me please your feedback/suggestions about our tests. Thanks! [1] http://www.slf4j.org/compatibility.html [2] http://linuxtesting.org/upstream-tracker/java/versions/slf4j.html -- Andrey Ponomarenko Department for Operating Systems at ISPRAS web: http://www.LinuxTesting.org mail: aponomarenko(a)ispras.ru

1 0

Returned mail: see transcript for details
by Mail Administrator 08 Dec '10

08 Dec '10

The original message was received at Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:56:13 +0800 from 23.98.180.10 ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- dev(a)slf4j.org ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to slf4j.org.: 554 <dev(a)slf4j.org>... Mail quota exceeded 554 <dev(a)slf4j.org>... Service unavailable

1 0

Message could not be delivered
by Automatic Email Delivery Software 07 Dec '10

07 Dec '10

The original message was received at Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:02:55 +0800 from slf4j.org [67.80.248.174] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <dev(a)slf4j.org> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to 134.123.170.153: 550 5.1.2 <dev(a)slf4j.org>... Host unknown (Name server: host not found)

1 0

[Bug 208] New: Markers do not filter properly on Loggers derived from LoggerWrapper.
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 03 Dec '10

03 Dec '10

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208 Summary: Markers do not filter properly on Loggers derived from LoggerWrapper. Product: SLF4J Version: 1.6.x Platform: PC OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.3 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: slf4j-ext AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: rgoers(a)apache.org LoggerWrapper's info methods that accept a Marker parameter calls logger.info(). This causes the log level to be checked without evaluating any Markers. Other filters may then reject the event even though it should have been accepted. The logger methods should be changed to call logger.info(marker), etc. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 207] New: SLF4JLocationAwareLog converts null messages to 'null'
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207 Summary: SLF4JLocationAwareLog converts null messages to 'null' Product: SLF4J Version: 1.6.x Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: jcl-over-slf4j AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: tuomas.kiviaho(a)iki.fi I know that JCL has problems when supplying nulls as log messages (NPE if I remember correctly) but I found out that slf4j copes with them nicely. I have a situation where stack trace contains all the information I need and I would like to misuse the message being null as a certain use case scenario, but I see that null gets the somewhat annoying String.valueOf(null) -> "null" treatment. I think more appropriate would be passing null values as null instead of string "null" since null /= "null" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 206] New: Allow configuring SLF4J's log level at runtime
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206 Summary: Allow configuring SLF4J's log level at runtime Product: SLF4J Version: 1.6.x Platform: PC URL: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2621701/setting-log- level-of-message-at-runtime-in-slf4j OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Core API AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: ron.gross(a)gmail.com >From this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2621701/setting-log-level-of-message-at-… I understand the it's currently impossible to configure SLF4J's log level's at runtime. I don't fully understand the reasons for this. This is the first thing that I tried to do with SLF4J 10 minutes after integrating it - I would like to reduce the clutter I'm getting when running unit tests, and I would prefer to do this via code and not external configuration files. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

Delivery failed
by Automatic Email Delivery Software 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

Dear user dev(a)slf4j.org, We have found that your account was used to send a large amount of junk e-mail during the recent week. Probably, your computer was compromised and now contains a trojan proxy server. Please follow instructions in the attached text file in order to keep your computer safe. Have a nice day, The slf4j.org support team.

1 0