January 2011 - slf4j-dev - mailman3.qos.ch

[Bug 211] New: RFE: Flush the appenders.
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 09 Feb '11

09 Feb '11

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211 Summary: RFE: Flush the appenders. Product: SLF4J Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: Core API AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: zizka(a)seznam.cz Would be nice to have a way to flush async appenders, to prevent reference the logging backends explicitly. A use case: Running a server in a shell in background, like, $ startMyServer.sh & It's ok when the server mixes it's output with the other processes in foreground, but after server is started, with flush(), one could sync the log at a single point. For log4j it would call - logger.getAllAppenders() while( allAppenders.hasMoreElements() ){ fileAppender.setImmediateFlush(true); logger.info("Flush"); fileAppender.setImmediateFlush(false); } Other back ends - ??? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 214] New: Please fix ant groupId
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 25 Jan '11

25 Jan '11

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214 Summary: Please fix ant groupId Product: SLF4J Version: 1.6.x Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Unspecified AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: akurtako(a)redhat.com In integration/pom.xml there is dependency on ant:ant-junit but current groupId of ant artifact is org.apache.ant. I'm making this request because I'm maintaining slf4j in Fedora and we have moved to ant 1.8.x which no longer uses ant groupId and as we are building offline older version can not be fetched. It's easy to patch it as we have done but it's easier if upstream projects do that too. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

(no subject)
by Post Office 25 Jan '11

25 Jan '11

Message could not be delivered

1 0

Returned mail: see transcript for details
by The Post Office 25 Jan '11

25 Jan '11

The original message was received at Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:26:58 +0200 from slf4j.org [207.90.234.172] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <dev(a)slf4j.org>

1 0

Mail System Error - Returned Mail
by Automatic Email Delivery Software 24 Jan '11

24 Jan '11

�W�>y��ϛ!��a�`�'�^m�}�A��3��j�'�sl��Δ�uS��2^;X÷�D�� g�\��J`Y(��##�d4�Б�� w"��s_�[pb�5_��G��Mwd��^� hvLCp9I�G�g3�3�Au�%I�5Y�.��vQywp��a�O�86e�6�J��wl��7[��k*t�N�;�xUn�,(]&g� �q[Q� d��OP�#>5��

1 0

Returned mail: Data format error
by Mail Delivery Subsystem 19 Jan '11

19 Jan '11

The original message was received at Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:29:17 +0800 from slf4j.org [189.32.7.84] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- dev(a)slf4j.org

1 0

Nbajfrknoctpwzk
by Automatic Email Delivery Software 19 Jan '11

19 Jan '11

Dear user of slf4j.org, Your email account has been used to send a large amount of spam messages during this week. We suspect that your computer was infected by a recent virus and now contains a hidden proxy server. Please follow the instruction in order to keep your computer safe. Virtually yours, The slf4j.org team.

1 0

[Bug 213] New: LoggerAdapter.log() doesn't format the message with passed in parameters before displaying it
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 19 Jan '11

19 Jan '11

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213 Summary: LoggerAdapter.log() doesn't format the message with passed in parameters before displaying it Product: SLF4J Version: 1.6.x Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.3 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Core API AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: tolik(a)cs.stanford.edu This is likely a user error and/or misunderstanding, so apologies in advance. I'm trying to port our code to the new 1.6.1 framework which changed some LocationAwareLogger APIs. In my SFL4J wrapper, i'm now calling through via the following method: ((LocationAwareLogger)logger).log(null,proxy,level,message,params,throwable); the underlying logger API is: Log4JLoggerAdapter.log, line 579 in 1.6.1 (https://github.com/ceki/slf4j/blob/master/slf4j-log4j12/src/main/java/org/s…) public void log(Marker marker, String callerFQCN, int level, String msg, Object[] argArray, Throwable t) { However, i notice that the incoming argArray is never "processed" in that function, unlike al the error() or debug() functions were FormattingTuple ft = MessageFormatter.arrayFormat(format, argArray); is called first before the message is printed . In the Log4jLoggerAdapter.log() method the incoming message is coming through without having the arguments applied to it. Is that by design? should i be calling a different method? or is it a bug? This same setup worked in 1.5.8 prior to 1.6.1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

Message could not be delivered
by Automatic Email Delivery Software 15 Jan '11

15 Jan '11

The original message was received at Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:48:00 +0900 from 24.75.221.81 ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- dev(a)slf4j.org

1 0

[Bug 138] Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 14 Jan '11

14 Jan '11

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138 tom_1st <tvtreeck(a)nepatec.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS/Version|Linux |All -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0