May 2012 - slf4j-dev - mailman3.qos.ch

[Bug 236] New: Use standard java.util.ServiceLoader for SLF4J Binding
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 25 Feb '13

25 Feb '13

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236 Summary: Use standard java.util.ServiceLoader for SLF4J Binding Product: SLF4J Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Core API AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: cronier.jy(a)gmail.com What about use ServiceLoader to find which binding to use? For JDK<1.6 compatibility, we can test Class.forName("java.util.ServiceLoader") and switch to an internal equivalent implementation of ServiceLoader. No need to have one (or multiple) StaticLoggerBinder. This ServiceLoader is used, for example, for JRE XSL implementation, or java.sql.Driver. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

2 10

[Bug 218] New: Broken link on website
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 21 Sep '12

21 Sep '12

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218 Summary: Broken link on website Product: SLF4J Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P1 Component: Unspecified AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: cowwoc(a)bbs.darktech.org The nabble links found at http://www.slf4j.org/mailing-lists.html point to deleted forums. Please recreate the forums. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 220] New: Cannot build slf4j from source - missing osgi-build.xml
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220 Summary: Cannot build slf4j from source - missing osgi-build.xml Product: SLF4J Version: 1.6.x Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: Unspecified AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: dick.jones(a)kinetx.com I tried to build slf4j 1.6.1 from source and the build failed with the following error: org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.2:run (ant-osgi-test) on project integration: An Ant BuildException has occured: The following error occurred while executing this line: java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\Users\dick.jones.KINETX\Downloads\slf4j-1.6.1\integration\osgi-build.xml (The system cannot find the file specified) I emailed Ceki Gulcu who said the file, osgi-build.xml, was inadvertently ommitted and asked that I enter this as a bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 186] New: [patch] Enhanced SimpleLogger implementation
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 12 Jun '12

12 Jun '12

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186 Summary: [patch] Enhanced SimpleLogger implementation Product: SLF4J Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Implementations AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: cedrik.lime(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=70) --> (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=70) New implementation of SimpleLogger I recently had to enhance SimpleLogger by back-porting some functionalities of commons-logging's SimpleLog into it. Namely, I have added the following: * optional configuration file; if none found, you get the exact same set of features as the currently released SimpleLogger. * enable to log more than the info log level * enable to set different log levels for different Loggers * enable to show/hide thread name * very primitive log messages customisation (about the same as commons-logging) Once again, the new code is totally compatible in behaviour and output with the currently released SimpleLogger. I also made it so that current users of commons-logging can upgrade to SLF4J very easily. Finally, I made sure to keep SimpleLogger as simple as possible: we already have fully-fledged logging frameworks, let's not re-invent one! I think this new implementation would enhance the value of SLF4J, while keeping a perfect retro-compatibility with previous versions. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

2 11

[Bug 234] New: log4j-over-slf4j and legacy projects providing their own log4j LoggerFactory
by bugzilla-daemon＠pixie.qos.ch 04 Jun '12

04 Jun '12

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234 Summary: log4j-over-slf4j and legacy projects providing their own log4j LoggerFactory Product: SLF4J Version: 1.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: log4j-over-slf4j AssignedTo: slf4j-dev(a)qos.ch ReportedBy: laurent.pellegrino(a)gmail.com I tried to use log4j-over-slf4j in a legacy project that provides its own LoggerFactory and when I use log4j-over-slf4j I get a java.lang.NoSuchMethodError for Logger#getLogger(String name, LoggerFactory factory). After having inspected the log4j-over-slf4j source code, it seems that the bridge does not provide an implementation for the Logger#getLogger(String name, LoggerFactory factory) method. Is there any reason for that? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

2 5

[GIT] SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java branch master updated. v_1.6.4-18-gdc6d3a0
by git-noreply＠pixie.qos.ch 29 May '12

29 May '12

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java". The branch, master has been updated via dc6d3a03f85d13a01d94f6ce01475ec66dd0b47f (commit) via 9b0732406d20f332b20012e71e41558c623dbc51 (commit) from 19579f1ba914e95f6aa1b7415cc73792f8e75134 (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=dc6d3a03f85d13a01d94f6ce01… http://github.com/ceki/slf4j/commit/dc6d3a03f85d13a01d94f6ce01475ec66dd0b47f commit dc6d3a03f85d13a01d94f6ce01475ec66dd0b47f Merge: 19579f1 9b07324 Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki(a)qos.ch> Date: Tue May 29 02:19:52 2012 -0700 Merge pull request #16 from dwijnand/patch-1 slf4j-site: Fix a typo. http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=9b0732406d20f332b20012e71e… http://github.com/ceki/slf4j/commit/9b0732406d20f332b20012e71e41558c623dbc51 commit 9b0732406d20f332b20012e71e41558c623dbc51 Author: Dale <dale.wijnand(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue May 29 11:57:30 2012 +0300 slf4j-site: Fix a typo. diff --git a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/extensions.html b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/extensions.html index fea45ac..7506d5b 100644 --- a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/extensions.html +++ b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/extensions.html @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 3 Logging system, it does not implement any of the features an audit logging system would require such as guaranteed delivery. - The recommended way of using the EventLogger in a typcial web application is to populate + The recommended way of using the EventLogger in a typical web application is to populate the SLF4J MDC with data that is related to the entire lifespan of the request such as the user's id, the user's ip address, the product name, etc. This can easily be done in a servlet fileter where the MDC can also be cleared at the end of the request. When an event that needs to be recorded ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: slf4j-site/src/site/pages/extensions.html | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) hooks/post-receive -- SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java

1 0

[GIT] SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java branch master updated. v_1.6.4-16-g19579f1
by git-noreply＠pixie.qos.ch 22 May '12

22 May '12

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java". The branch, master has been updated via 19579f1ba914e95f6aa1b7415cc73792f8e75134 (commit) from f5b19567277a62ed7595b1bc72ea98ca90a7f6dc (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=19579f1ba914e95f6aa1b7415c… http://github.com/ceki/slf4j/commit/19579f1ba914e95f6aa1b7415cc73792f8e75134 commit 19579f1ba914e95f6aa1b7415cc73792f8e75134 Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki(a)qos.ch> Date: Tue May 22 22:54:50 2012 +0200 capitalize Migrator as it's a name diff --git a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/docs.html b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/docs.html index c077b47..2fa7abd 100644 --- a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/docs.html +++ b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/docs.html @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ <li><a href="faq.html">FAQ</a></li> <li><a href="codes.html">SLF4J error messages</a></li> <li><a href="legacy.html">Bridging legacy APIs</a></li> - <li><a href="migrator.html">SLF4J migrator</a></li> + <li><a href="migrator.html">SLF4J Migrator</a></li> <li><a href="extensions.html">SLF4J extensions</a></li> <li><a href="localization.html">Localization/Internalization support</a></li> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: slf4j-site/src/site/pages/docs.html | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) hooks/post-receive -- SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java

1 0

[GIT] SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java branch master updated. v_1.6.4-15-gf5b1956
by git-noreply＠pixie.qos.ch 22 May '12

22 May '12

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java". The branch, master has been updated via f5b19567277a62ed7595b1bc72ea98ca90a7f6dc (commit) from e0985457677dcc7e2db3d14d37a512e4cb483b47 (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=f5b19567277a62ed7595b1bc72… http://github.com/ceki/slf4j/commit/f5b19567277a62ed7595b1bc72ea98ca90a7f6dc commit f5b19567277a62ed7595b1bc72ea98ca90a7f6dc Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki(a)qos.ch> Date: Tue May 22 22:48:38 2012 +0200 applied corrections provided by Stuart Davey diff --git a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html index 4b70707..df7aba4 100644 --- a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html +++ b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html @@ -184,9 +184,9 @@ SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further detail SLF4J does not rely on any special class loader machinery. In - fact, the each SLF4J binding is hardwired at compile - time to use one and only one specific logging framework. - For example, the slf4j-log4j12-${project.version}.jar binding is + fact, each SLF4J binding is hardwired at compile time + to use one and only one specific logging framework. For + example, the slf4j-log4j12-${project.version}.jar binding is bound at compile time to use log4j. In your code, in addition to slf4j-api-${project.version}.jar, you simply drop one and only one binding of your choice onto the diff --git a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/migrator.html b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/migrator.html index e983d00..3d31b11 100644 --- a/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/migrator.html +++ b/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/migrator.html @@ -39,11 +39,11 @@ <img src="images/slf4j-migrator.gif" alt="slf4j-migrator.gif"/> - Use the application should be self-explanatory. Please note that + Use of the application should be self-explanatory. Please note that this migration tool does in-place replacement of Java files, meaning that there will be no back-up copies of modified files. It is your responsibility to backup your files before using SLF4J - migrator. + Migrator. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html | 6 +++--- slf4j-site/src/site/pages/migrator.html | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) hooks/post-receive -- SLF4J: Simple Logging Facade for Java

1 0

[Bug 257] Recommended Logger Name
by bugzilla-daemon＠qos.ch 10 May '12

10 May '12

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257 Ralph Goers <rgoers(a)apache.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rgoers(a)apache.org --- Comment #6 from Ralph Goers <rgoers(a)apache.org> 2012-05-10 08:02:51 CEST --- Here is another perspective. Logger names are primarily used to choose the configuration that will apply to the specific events being logged. While class names are one good way of doing that there is absolutely nothing wrong with using some other scheme as long as it meets your requirements on filtering, appender selection and ultimately publishing the events. That said, as was noted logger names are hierarchical. Names like Billing, Billing.Automatic and Billing.Recurrent only make sense if that hierarchy meets your requirements. Providing a patch with examples is probably the best way for you to get this issue resolved. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 257] Recommended Logger Name
by bugzilla-daemon＠qos.ch 09 May '12

09 May '12

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257 --- Comment #5 from Irv Rabin <ipr1118(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-09 23:08:03 CEST --- Joachim, thanks for your response. Your voice has been heard. :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0