June 2021 - slf4j-dev - mailman3.qos.ch

[qos-ch/slf4j] c34960: rename private method
by Ceki Gulcu 15 Jun '21

15 Jun '21

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j Commit: c34960912ac24aee60b62499210b1ee08c1f2f45 https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/commit/c34960912ac24aee60b62499210b1ee08c1f… Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki(a)qos.ch> Date: 2021-06-15 (Tue, 15 Jun 2021) Changed paths: M pom.xml M slf4j-api/src/main/java/org/slf4j/spi/DefaultLoggingEventBuilder.java M slf4j-log4j12/src/main/java/org/slf4j/log4j12/Log4jLoggerAdapter.java M slf4j-log4j12/src/test/java/org/slf4j/log4j12/InvocationTest.java M slf4j-site/src/site/pages/news.html Log Message: ----------- rename private method

1 0

[JIRA] Updates for SLF4J-457: OSGi support in SLF4J 2.0
by QOS.CH (JIRA) 15 Jun '21

15 Jun '21

SLF4J / SLF4J-457 [Resolved] OSGi support in SLF4J 2.0 ============================== Here's what changed in this issue in the last few minutes. There is 1 comment. View or comment on issue using this link https://jira.qos.ch/browse/SLF4J-457 ============================== 1 comment ------------------------------ Björn Kautler on 15/Jun/21 4:19 PM Ah, ok, I have no idea. I'm not an OSGi expert, I just tried to make some libs OSGi compatible and played with it. I was not aware it is an extension, but I would expect that it is just ignored like any other unknown manifest attribute. But again, this issue is NOT fixed, so please reopen it. This issues asks for supporting the OSGi native service loader mechanism. My PR with that manifest entry is just a quick-fix work-around using the service loader mediator. But the request here is to properly support the OSGi native service loader mechanism. ============================== This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.8.0#808000-sha1:e2c7e59)

1 0

[qos-ch/slf4j] 3e5110: Avoid potentially "expensive" rendering of message...
by Ceki Gulcu 15 Jun '21

15 Jun '21

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j Commit: 3e5110501cad3c77527d1c94eb6c6b5b67de892a https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/commit/3e5110501cad3c77527d1c94eb6c6b5b67de… Author: Antonio Tomac <Antonio.Tomac(a)infobip.com> Date: 2021-06-15 (Tue, 15 Jun 2021) Changed paths: M jcl-over-slf4j/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/SLF4JLocationAwareLog.java M jcl-over-slf4j/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/logging/test/InvokeJCLTest.java Log Message: ----------- Avoid potentially "expensive" rendering of message Object to String when log level is disabled SLF4J-497

1 0

[JIRA] Updates for SLF4J-457: OSGi support in SLF4J 2.0
by QOS.CH (JIRA) 15 Jun '21

15 Jun '21

SLF4J / SLF4J-457 [Resolved] OSGi support in SLF4J 2.0 ============================== Here's what changed in this issue in the last few minutes. There are 2 updates, 2 comments. View or comment on issue using this link https://jira.qos.ch/browse/SLF4J-457 ============================== 2 updates ------------------------------ Changes by Ceki Gülcü on 15/Jun/21 10:20 AM Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: In Progress) ============================== 2 comments ------------------------------ Ceki Gülcü on 15/Jun/21 10:11 AM [~Vampire] Thank you. Since "Require-Capability" manifest entry is an OSGi extension, it will not impact non-OSGi environment. The second par of question was with respect to OSGi environment which were *not* expecting the "Require-Capability" entry. I guess time will tell. ------------------------------ Ceki Gülcü on 15/Jun/21 10:20 AM Fixed in [commit 4a1d51|] ============================== This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.8.0#808000-sha1:e2c7e59)

1 0

[JIRA] Updates for SLF4J-457: OSGi support in SLF4J 1.8
by QOS.CH (JIRA) 14 Jun '21

14 Jun '21

SLF4J / SLF4J-457 [In Progress] OSGi support in SLF4J 1.8 ============================== Here's what changed in this issue in the last few minutes. There is 1 comment. View or comment on issue using this link https://jira.qos.ch/browse/SLF4J-457 ============================== 1 comment ------------------------------ Björn Kautler on 15/Jun/21 12:10 AM No, it should not have any impact outside OSGi, besides a few more bytes in the jar. I don't get the second question. ============================== This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.8.0#808000-sha1:e2c7e59)

1 0

[qos-ch/slf4j] 57a06a: minor doc fix
by Ceki Gulcu 14 Jun '21

14 Jun '21

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j Commit: 57a06aaa2c0f3a018006923a7da919e245bea359 https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/commit/57a06aaa2c0f3a018006923a7da919e245be… Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki(a)qos.ch> Date: 2021-06-14 (Mon, 14 Jun 2021) Changed paths: M slf4j-jdk14/src/test/java/org/slf4j/issue/CallerInfoTest.java Log Message: ----------- minor doc fix

1 0

[qos-ch/slf4j] 61e879: fix SLF4J-511 for j.u.l
by Ceki Gulcu 14 Jun '21

14 Jun '21

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j Commit: 61e879fa3293b4cb6d946dbdbd8c99c344f14aac https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/commit/61e879fa3293b4cb6d946dbdbd8c99c344f1… Author: Ceki Gulcu <ceki(a)qos.ch> Date: 2021-06-14 (Mon, 14 Jun 2021) Changed paths: M slf4j-jdk14/src/main/java/org/slf4j/jul/JDK14LoggerAdapter.java M slf4j-jdk14/src/test/java/org/slf4j/issue/CallerInfoTest.java Log Message: ----------- fix SLF4J-511 for j.u.l

1 0

JDK 17 is now in Rampdown Phase One
by Rory O'Donnell 14 Jun '21

14 Jun '21

Hi Ceki, * Per the JDK 17 schedule , we are in Rampdown Phase One [1].* **Please advise if you find any issues while testing the latest Early Access builds**.** * Schedule: o *2021/06/10 Rampdown Phase One* o 2021/07/15 Rampdown Phase Two o 2021/08/05 Initial Release Candidate o 2021/08/19 Final Release Candidate o 2021/09/14 General Availability The overall feature set is frozen. No further JEPs will be targeted to this release. ** * Important JEPs have been integrated – Attention Required! * *JEP 411: **Deprecate the Security Manager for Removal*<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411> o Deprecate, for removal, most Security Manager related classes and methods. o Warning message at startup if the Security Manager is enabled on the command line. o Warning message at run time if a Java application or library installs a Security Manager dynamically. o Deprecation is in concert with the legacy Applet API (JEP 398). * *JEP 407: **Remove RMI Activation*<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/407> o Removal the Remote Method Invocation (RMI) Activation mechanism, while preserving the rest of RMI. o It was deprecated for removal by JEP 385<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/385>in Java SE 15. * *JEP 403: **Strongly Encapsulate JDK Internals*<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/403> o Strongly encapsulate all internal elements of the JDK, except for critical internal APIs such as /sun.misc.Unsafe/. o It will no longer be possible to relax the strong encapsulation of internal elements via a single command-line option. * Other features integrated in JDK 17: o *JEP 306: **Restore Always-Strict Floating-Point Semantics*<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/306> o JEP 356: Enhanced Pseudo-Random Number Generators<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/356> o JEP 382: New macOS Rendering Pipeline<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/382> o JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/391> o JEP 398: Deprecate the Applet API for Removal<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/398> o *JEP 406: **Pattern Matching for switch (Preview)*<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/406> o JEP 409: Sealed Classes<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/409> o JEP 410: Remove the Experimental AOT and JIT Compiler<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410> o JEP 412: Foreign Function & Memory API (Incubator)<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/412> o *JEP 414: **Vector API (Second Incubator)*<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/414> o *JEP 415: **Context-Specific Deserialization Filters*<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/415> *OpenJDK 17 Early Access build 26 is available at **https://jdk.java.net/17*<https://jdk.java.net/17> * These early-access , open-source builds are provided under the o GNU General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception<https://openjdk.java.net/legal/gplv2+ce.html> * Release Notes are available at https://jdk.java.net/17/release-notes<https://jdk.java.net/17/release-notes> * Changes in recent builds that maybe of interest: * *Build 26:* o JDK-8268241: deprecate JVM TI Heap functions 1.0 o JDK-8266846: Add java.time.InstantSource o JDK-8248268: Support KWP in addition to KW o JDK-8204686: Dynamic parallel reference processing support for Parallel GC o JDK-8259530: Generated docs contain MIT/GPL-licenced works without reproducing the licence [*Reported by Apache Maven*] o JDK-8266766: Arrays of types that cannot be an annotation member do not yield exceptions [*Reported by ByteBuddy*] o JDK-8266598: Exception values for AnnotationTypeMismatchException are not always informative [*Reported by ByteBuddy*] * *Build 25* o JDK-8266653: Change update mode for JDK rpm/deb installers as it breaks "yum update" for JDK11+ o JDK-8263202: Update Hebrew/Indonesian/Yiddish ISO 639 language codes to current o JDK-8229517: Support for optional asynchronous/buffered logging o JDK-8182043: Access to Windows Large Icons *OpenJDK 18 Early Access build 1 is now available at **https://jdk.java.net/18* <https://jdk.java.net/18> * These early-access , open-source builds are provided under the o GNU General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception <https://openjdk.java.net/legal/gplv2+ce.html> * Issues addressed in this build - here <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/compare/jdk-18%2B0...jdk-18%2B1> *Other Topics which might be of Interest: * ** * Java Cryptographic Roadmap [2] has been updated. * Inside Java Newscast #6 [3] o a closer look at the list of JEPs of JDK 17 as well as the development process * Inside Java Newscast #7 [4] o discusses in greater detail `pattern matching for switch`, previewed in JDK 17 Rgds,Rory [1] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2021-June/005690.html <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2021-June/005690.html><https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2021-June/005690.html><https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2021-June/005690.html> [2] https://java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html <https://java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html> [3] https://inside.java/2021/06/10/insidejava-newscast-006/ <https://inside.java/2021/06/10/insidejava-newscast-006/> [4] https://inside.java/2021/06/13/podcast-017/ <https://inside.java/2021/06/13/podcast-017/> -- Rgds, Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA, Dublin, Ireland

1 0

[JIRA] Updates for SLF4J-457: OSGi support in SLF4J 1.8
by QOS.CH (JIRA) 14 Jun '21

14 Jun '21

SLF4J / SLF4J-457 [In Progress] OSGi support in SLF4J 1.8 ============================== Here's what changed in this issue in the last few minutes. There is 1 comment. View or comment on issue using this link https://jira.qos.ch/browse/SLF4J-457 ============================== 1 comment ------------------------------ Ceki Gülcü on 14/Jun/21 11:30 AM [~Vampire] Silly question: will this Require-Capability have any impact on non OSGi environments? And what about OSGi environments? ============================== This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.8.0#808000-sha1:e2c7e59)

1 0